🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an event that was initiated as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass events where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the business of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The tide has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this movement and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has evolved since those days, giving reduced attention to the narratives of colonial slavery and civil rights battles, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the way the observance is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to erosion: the transformation of Black History Month has stymied the point of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Little demonstrates how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a revitalized conservative movement in the guise of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we saw the biggest extreme right demonstration in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a member of parliament feels emboldened to say that a lack of white people in parts of a city is a source of worry. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are expanding in Europe as a entirety.

In the US, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to scrub African American heritage and narrative from the historical documents is in progress. One of the political figure's initial presidential directives focused on the museum of African American legacy, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by depicting the United States “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance represents how minimally it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than confronting the conditions of the present. It also reveals how its short period means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is required. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden actions for racial equality and recognition in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has failed to deliver.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the situation evolves (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) included in school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade politics, and provides room for individuals, particularly youth, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and awareness of subtle slights, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and responsive. It could be that an entire name rebrand is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.